Author |
Message |
Infinity266
Joined: 24 Jan 2006 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 4:47 pm Post subject: redundant sync |
|
|
I have a setup question
I have 3 systems that I need to sync a folder called sites and have the sync be redundant if I lose connection to one of the systems. There are 3 options I can think of but not sure if any will cause an issue.
Option 1:
Install Vice Versa on all 3 systems. Have all 3 push and pull files.
Option 2:
Install Vice Versa on all 3 systems. Have all 3 push files to each other when the local sites folder is updated.
Option 3:
Install Vice Versa on all 3 systems. Have all 3 pull files from each other when the either of the remote sites folder is updated.
Will any of these cause an issue if one system is in the middle of an update and another starts to update?
I would like to setup option 1 but I am concerned about the update issue listed above. Also about the bandwidth required for option 1 and 3 to monitor remote folder for changes.
Any ideas for best setup would be helpful and appreciated. Thanks |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TGRMN Software Site Admin
Joined: 10 Jan 2005 Posts: 8759
|
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 11:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
The best one is option 2. Each machine has ViceVersa installed locally and as soon as changes are detected locally the changed files are pushed to the other 2 sites. _________________ --
TGRMN Software Support
http://www.tgrmn.com
http://www.compareandmerge.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|