Author |
Message |
Van Guest
|
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 1:41 pm Post subject: Client/Server and Server/Server Intellegent Compare |
|
|
We use VV and think it's a great product. Thank you.
We have offices in several locations around the world and have large amounts of data we keep in sync between servers. VV handles it but it's extremely slow.
We would like to see a C/S and/or S/S intelligent compare system. It would be nice if there was a service that ran on each server that would perform the scan every five minutes and update it's own local database of what has changed. Then when a remote system connects looking for changes, the database is scanned from some marker and the files are synchronized.
The goal is to avoid the extremely long and painful directory/folder scan that occurs by the remote system every time VV performs a check for changes. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TGRMN Software Site Admin
Joined: 10 Jan 2005 Posts: 8769
|
Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 3:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, this would definitely be a good improvement.
This improvementt is on our radar screen
Thank you for the feedback, much appreciated. _________________ --
TGRMN Software Support
http://www.tgrmn.com
http://www.compareandmerge.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vbernd
Joined: 21 Apr 2011 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Thu Apr 21, 2011 12:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
has there been any improvements/developments in this direction?
a file sync lasts 4 hours, most of the time comparing the remote target... (300.000 folders)
we would really appreciate a solution...
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
TGRMN Software Site Admin
Joined: 10 Jan 2005 Posts: 8769
|
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 7:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Are you backing up / replicating form source (local) to target (remote) ? If positive, we have a no-rescan target beta for you to try if you want. thanks _________________ --
TGRMN Software Support
http://www.tgrmn.com
http://www.compareandmerge.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vbernd
Joined: 21 Apr 2011 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2011 8:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
No, I'm synchronizing.
I think a (local) VV database on the remote machine would be the only solution.... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|